+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com

What distinguishes excellent leaders?Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT :Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
What distinguishes excellent leaders? While each leader is unique, one aspect that all great leaders have is the leadership philosophy they establish and practice. A leadership philosophy is essentially an attitude that leaders hold and that serves as a guide for their behavior. While formal theories of leadership continue to emerge, exceptional leaders appear to be guided by an overall philosophy.
What is your leadership philosophy? In this Assignment, you will explore what guides your own leadership.
To Prepare:
Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
NURS 6053 Assignment Personal Leadership Philosophies SlNURS 6053 Assignment Personal Leadership Philosophies Sl
Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.The Assignment (2-3 pages):
Personal Leadership Philosophies
Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:
A description of your core valuesA personal mission/vision statementAn analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profileA description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthenA development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.Be sure to incorporate your colleagues’ feedback on your CliftonStrengths Assessment from this Module’s Discussion 2.
Tags: Walden University NURS 6053: INTERPROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL AND SYSTEMS LEADERSHIP
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellent Good Fair PoorDevelop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:· A description of your core values.· A personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail a set of core values.
The response accurately and completely describes in detail a personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)The response describes a set of core values.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague or inaccurate.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile.· A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen.Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment.
The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail two key behaviors to strengthen.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.Points Range: 50 (50%) – 55 (55%)An accurate, complete, and detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific and accurate examples.
The response includes a comprehensive synthesis of information gleaned from sources that fully support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources to fully support the responses provided.
Points Range: 44 (44%) – 49 (49%)An accurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some specific examples.
The response includes a synthesis of information gleaned from sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 1 credible outside source, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources which may support the responses provided.
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 43 (43%)A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples that are vague or inaccurate.
The response includes information gleaned from 2 or 3 sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 38 (38%)A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision that is vague and inaccurate, does not include any examples, or is missing.
The response does not include any additional information gleaned from outside sources, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity

Related