+1443 776-2705 panelessays@gmail.com
  

Counseling Theories – reality therapy and choice theory Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions His person- or child-centered (in this chapter also called “student-centered”) Candidates are asked to write a research paper based on 3 identified counseling theories of their choice. This paper must encompass a comprehensive literature review of the chosen theories and be written in a way that compares and contrasts such theories. For each counseling theory, the candidate must clearly outline research that supports whether or not each counseling approach is evidence-based. The paper must follow APA style, 6th edition, and must include a title page, abstract, and reference list. It should include a comprehensive review of the literature published in journals or books (at least 10 recent references dated 2005 or earlier, no websites, ERIC citations, or newspaper articles). See detailed rubric at end of syllabus for more information. Assignment due on XXX A rubric for this assignment can be found at the end of the syllabus. Students must receive at least a 70% to receive a passing grade. A student who scores less than 70% of the grade on the assignment must complete an Individual Remediation Plan with the instructor. Failure to successfully remediate the assignment will result in a F (Fail) grade in the course. Required Research Paper Rubric (Aligns with LiveText/do not change) The “Counseling Theories Research Paper” assignment fulfills: · FPEC 1.1, 1.8, 2.1 Element Not Met Exceeded Literature Review (1.1) 7 points Candidate did not provide recent and sufficient number of sources and sources relevant to the content of the assignment. Evidence-based Research (1.8, 2.1) 5 points Candidate did not provide evidence-based research in the paper regarding all 3 counseling theories. Candidate provided evidence-based research in the paper regarding all 3 counseling theories. The write-up of the evidence-based research was thorough for all three theories. Candidate provided evidence-based research in the paper regarding all 3 counseling theories. The write-up of the evidence-based research was thorough for all three theories. The candidate clearly presented the types of populations that would benefit from the three counseling approaches (based on the research). Compare and Contrast 5 points Candidate did not adequately compare and contrast the chosen counseling theories. Candidate adequately described, compared, and contrasted the chosen counseling theories. Candidate adequately described, compared, and contrasted the chosen counseling theories. Description of theories was well developed. Critical thought was apparent through the candidate’s comparison and contrast of the theories. APA Style 3 points Candidate’s paper did not follow APA style of writing in the areas of grammar, punctuation, design, and reference list. Candidate’s paper followed APA style of writing in the areas of grammar, punctuation, design, and reference list. A few minor errors were found. Candidate’s paper followed APA style of writing in the areas of grammar, punctuation, design, and reference list. TOTAL SCORE =/20 points* * All students must pass the assignment having ‘Met’ or ‘Exceeded’ each element. Any ‘Not Met’ element requires instructor remediation prior to the end of the course to achieve a passing grade for Due April 6 Wednesday by 8pm Central Standard Time Translating Knowledge From an Evaluation Report Instructors and professors often comment that they learn much more about their subject matter when they begin to teach it. When they try to explain the topic to someone else they begin to connect concepts in new ways. They anticipate questions that students might ask, consider different viewpoints, and think more critically. For this Discussion, take the perspective of someone who is instructing his or her colleagues and sharing your understanding of research methods and program evaluation. To prepare for the Discussion, select an evaluation report from this week’s resources. Consider how you would present the information to a group of colleagues. Required Readings that Program Selected below Program/Reading Selected Law, B., & Shek, D. (2011). Process Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program: Project P.A.T.H.S. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(5), 539-548. Annotated Bibliography Worksheet | Graded Directions Decide on a specific topic within psychology on which you want to conduct research. This is the topic on which you will chat with your research team about on discussion board assignments and ultimately write your research proposal. Conduct a literature search on the topic using PsycINFO. As you go, you might find that you need to narrow down your topic. Feel free to do so. (For example, if your topic is simply “goal setting,” you will probably find hundreds or thousands of papers on goal setting. You need to narrow that down to something like “goal revision” or “goal conflict” to get a manageable list.) Parameters Download the Annotated Bibliography worksheet. Preview the document Access databases at the Evans Library (Links to an external site.) and search the PsychINFO database. Submit your 15 articles as separate PDF documents. Submit the completed worksheet on your research topic and APA-formatted citations for at least 15 articles on your topic that you found while conducting your literature search. At least 10 of these articles must be empirical studies. In other words, they should examine hypotheses by collecting data and then reporting results. These articles should be ones that you plan to read and summarize. Your ultimate goal is to find articles that you can use in the literature review section of your research proposal. You will need to use at least 10 articles in your research proposal. Fifteen is the minimum for this assignment because, as you read, you will find that many are not useful for your paper. The articles that you use in your paper should lead to a testable hypothesis so that your hypothesis is supported by the research you review. Keep that in mind as you read them. As you are reviewing the abstracts to decide which articles to include on this list, note in your annotated bibliography whether the article is empirical or a theory paper. Please make sure that you have at least 10 articles that are truly empirical studies. Begin reading these articles. You will need to summarize the four most influential to you next week. Try not to be intimidated by any complicated statistical analyses. The author will interpret them for you and discuss the overall results in the discussion section. You need not understand the analyses to understand the general findings of the research. Pay attention to any suggestions for future research. Those may give you ideas for your proposed study RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization;  and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://nerdyassignmenthelp.com/order Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!